Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Showing Original Post only (View all)Gary Johnson unable to name leader of North Korea in interview [View all]
Libertarian presidential nominee Gary Johnson couldn't name the leader of North KoreaLibertarian presidential nominee Gary Johnson drew a blank again.
In an interview with The New York Times published on Wednesday, Johnson skirted around a question about whether he could identify North Korea's leader, Kim Jong Un.
When asked if he knew the name of the volatile leader, Johnson said, "I do."
When he was pressed further to identify the North Korean leader, Johnson appeared incredulous.
You want me to name the person" Johnson responded. Really.
more at link
http://www.businessinsider.com/libertarian-presidential-nominee-gary-johnson-couldnt-name-the-leader-of-north-korea-2016-10
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
34 replies, 2350 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (29)
ReplyReply to this post
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
+1, didn't Weld say recently that he's focusing on tRump now? Seems like he's breaking from the
uponit7771
Oct 2016
#7
And they want to be included in serious Presidential debates? unbelievable n/t
secondwind
Oct 2016
#8
I honestly don't see the attraction of Johnson, other than his support for pot legalization.
Tarheel_Dem
Oct 2016
#10
"Why can't us poor, oppressed Libertarians be in the Presidential Debates??!?!?"
hatrack
Oct 2016
#22
Johnson's limp response to a softball question about foreign diplomacy makes him ineligable
Agnosticsherbet
Oct 2016
#28