2016 Postmortem

Omaha Steve

(99,879 posts)

34. Source or link?

Reply to MADem (Reply #26)

Wed Oct 7, 2015, 06:11 AM

Oct 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

44 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

About that AFT for Hillary thing... had been made long before it was announced in July. [View all] Omaha Steve Oct 2015 OP

FAUX News stirring the pot and Sanders supporters with their spoons ready. Metric System Oct 2015 #1

Watchdog gets Hillary users to quote it often Omaha Steve Oct 2015 #3

Seems you were the first on this thread with your knife. eom Fawke Em Oct 2015 #6

I haven't read it yet. Why don't you simply refute anything that is not true in the article? You sabrina 1 Oct 2015 #7

One percent of the membership complained. 99 percent aren't having any issue. MADem Oct 2015 #26

Source or link? Omaha Steve Oct 2015 #34

Fox news? Really? hrmjustin Oct 2015 #2

Please see Reply 7. merrily Oct 2015 #17

Apparently I have too many people on ignore Flying Squirrel Oct 2015 #24

If you can see my post, but not the post of sabrina 1, I don't know what to say. merrily Oct 2015 #25

I probably can't see hers because of who she was replying to. Flying Squirrel Oct 2015 #32

Good to know! merrily Oct 2015 #37

Watchdog.org is a propaganda arm of the far right wing Franklin Center. nt MADem Oct 2015 #28

Yet the numbers they quote are from the US Dept. of Labor Omaha Steve Oct 2015 #33

I think you'll find that many of these endorsements were pledged after she lost in 2008. frylock Oct 2015 #4

those pesky watchdog people restorefreedom Oct 2015 #5

You place credence in watchdog.org? That probably says way more about you than you intended. MADem Oct 2015 #29

i was speaking generically restorefreedom Oct 2015 #35

"The scandal-ridden Clinton family non-profits" emulatorloo Oct 2015 #8

+1. Exactly. n/t FSogol Oct 2015 #10

10% spent on good works seems low questionseverything Oct 2015 #12

Why are you repeating falsehoods propagated by Rush Limbaugh? MADem Oct 2015 #30

more debunking debunked questionseverything Oct 2015 #39

Are you supporting O'Malley? merrily Oct 2015 #18

Bernie emulatorloo Oct 2015 #40

The source is rather dispicable. Watchdog dot org affects a "nonpartisan" stance, but all their MADem Oct 2015 #27

I wonder; who was the alerter? Hmmm.... pipoman Oct 2015 #9

Good for the jury. Knee jerk source shaming does not refute a thing. merrily Oct 2015 #19

scraping the bottom of the barrel moobu2 Oct 2015 #11

All the financial report info is correct, even on Watchdog & Faux Omaha Steve Oct 2015 #13

When you are in a hole stop digging. Find better sources. emulatorloo Oct 2015 #41

This message was self-deleted by its author Omaha Steve Oct 2015 #42

Scraping the bottom of the right wing barrel, too. Watchdog.org has a far right wing lean. MADem Oct 2015 #31

Rec'd and bookmarked. Thanks n/t Catherina Oct 2015 #14

Why wouldn't they support the presumptive nominee moobu2 Oct 2015 #15

Bernie is ahead of Obama at this point in 2007 (edited) Omaha Steve Oct 2015 #16

If true, too bad. He has a better chance to win the general than she does. merrily Oct 2015 #20

Because there is not and should not be any "presumptive nominee" pipoman Oct 2015 #21

Clearly, a strong relationship exists between Weingarten and the Clintons and that was the merrily Oct 2015 #22

... making a list, And checking it twice; Babel_17 Oct 2015 #23

the Clintons forsake people olddots Oct 2015 #36

Thank you for your helpful link to Fox News. MineralMan Oct 2015 #38

Actually, the great information was from watchdog... MrMickeysMom Oct 2015 #43

Not that anyone cares, but AFT and CGI Starry Messenger Oct 2015 #44