Proud of the media for finally seeing that a 6-person field is different than a 2-person field! [View all]

For the first three states, all the pundits had to say is that the majority of voters "rejected" the candidate who got the most votes. But suddenly, for some unknowable reason, they stopped, even though once again no candidate got a majority.

I've even seen some pundits actually explain that in a crowded field, the winning candidate is going to obviously end up with less votes than they would if there were only two candidates. Imagine that!

What could possibly have changed? Did someone organize a remedial math class for the punditry?

Whatever it was, I'm very proud of them. And hopefully they'll keep this valuable knowledge for more than three days. But we'll see!