Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

G_j

(40,367 posts)
27. Upon looking further
Wed Jun 11, 2014, 04:20 PM
Jun 2014

Last edited Thu Jun 12, 2014, 03:15 AM - Edit history (1)

ISIS does seem to have a certain agenda. However, a pharmacologist who is particularly critical of alternative medicine?.. I'd look somewhere else..

You are what you eat superpatriotman Jun 2014 #1
My sister in law is in the industry....she says this is NOT unexpected and to not be alarmed VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #2
Scientists can be every bit as risk-blind as laymen. GliderGuider Jun 2014 #3
She has a new tiny baby....who she is only feeding adult food. ...not baby food. VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #4
People "in the industry" with PhDs miscalculate risks all the time. GliderGuider Jun 2014 #5
there is no way to do that....if you eat it...it enters your body.... VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #6
UMmm NOT with what they are genetically modifying with...IE PIG Genes Frog Genes ...give me a break. Drew Richards Jun 2014 #29
Should I instead trust MattBaggins Jun 2014 #10
"Random internet article" ... What a neutral characterization! GliderGuider Jun 2014 #17
That's what it is; a random internet article from a writer with a known agenda. REP Jun 2014 #20
Can you point me towards evidence to that effect? GliderGuider Jun 2014 #22
#19 and #21 REP Jun 2014 #24
Ah, you disagree with his opinion! OK then. GliderGuider Jun 2014 #33
Well yes. I know my ass from third base. Ho not so much. REP Jun 2014 #37
Random internet articles can contain............anything. Enthusiast Jun 2014 #26
Scientists themselves can be falliable, this is true. AverageJoe90 Jun 2014 #44
She's in the industry profiting from this. Enough said. n/t pnwmom Jun 2014 #8
Your precious Saint Mercola likes to collect a paycheck MattBaggins Jun 2014 #11
I have no idea who you're talking about. n/t pnwmom Jun 2014 #13
this appears to be coming from legitimate sourse G_j Jun 2014 #7
Not so much REP Jun 2014 #19
interesting G_j Jun 2014 #23
Science fact seem to be his thing REP Jun 2014 #25
Upon looking further G_j Jun 2014 #27
He seems especially dismissive of expensive water, or homeopathy as it is often called REP Jun 2014 #36
Your post demonstrates the need for better eductation jeff47 Jun 2014 #9
The conclusion of the report says this: GliderGuider Jun 2014 #12
Monsanto has to sell its GMO's so they can sell their herbicides pnwmom Jun 2014 #15
And that conclusion is talking about what we discovered in 1948. jeff47 Jun 2014 #18
The problem may not be my lack of education GliderGuider Jun 2014 #31
If it isn't, you're welcome to explain how the cfDNA gets expressed. (nt) jeff47 Jun 2014 #38
My degree is not in molecular biology. However, GliderGuider Jun 2014 #41
Not genes being expressed. jeff47 Jun 2014 #43
A couple of comments GliderGuider Jun 2014 #40
:eyes: jeff47 Jun 2014 #42
basically what my Sister in Law explained to me when I showed her this article a couple weeks back VanillaRhapsody Jun 2014 #16
Although it might look like it, that MineralMan Jun 2014 #14
About the Institute and Ho: REP Jun 2014 #21
It sounds to me like Ho has opinions you disagree with. GliderGuider Jun 2014 #30
Not confirmed! Hyperbole and mis-information. Non-scientific... yawnmaster Jun 2014 #28
K&R! DeSwiss Jun 2014 #32
Hmmm. Well would you look at that. GliderGuider Jun 2014 #34
Yeah..... DeSwiss Jun 2014 #35
Don't let George Bush know about this. L0oniX Jun 2014 #39
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nucleic Acid Invaders fro...»Reply #27