Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
54. But I think we can all agree how awful it is to have foundations that do nothing
Sat Jun 28, 2014, 02:43 PM
Jun 2014

Last edited Sun Jun 29, 2014, 03:07 PM - Edit history (1)

But help the politicians who help the one percent.

To bad that foundation isn't helping to defray the students' tuition costs, which seems to be going up up and UP! in direct relationship to the sky rocketing level of the speaker fees.

Well, it wouldn't make poor Hillary "dead broke" again. Tierra_y_Libertad Jun 2014 #1
LMFAO L0oniX Jun 2014 #2
LOL LuvNewcastle Jun 2014 #99
why isn't she allowed to make $$ warrior1 Jun 2014 #3
The rules are no different for Hillary, so, of course, she doesn't have to return the fee, but . . . InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #34
She earned it yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #50
That is ridiculous. There is a huge speakers circuit, everyone has their fee. Don't book them if stevenleser Jun 2014 #67
That's true. LuvNewcastle Jun 2014 #101
Absolutely true, and nothing in my comment was meant to suggest otherwise... InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #108
It's not the University that's asking for the money back, IronGate Jun 2014 #124
No, they don't have a legit complaint. The fee was paid by a private donors group. stevenleser Jun 2014 #126
Sorry, but the students see it differently and I'll side with the students. IronGate Jun 2014 #129
There is no "it" to see differently. The fee was not paid by the university but by a private group. stevenleser Jun 2014 #137
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2014 #153
Yes, it's 100% private and separate from the University. Nice try, but no. stevenleser Jun 2014 #155
I disagree, and I do see it differently. IronGate Jun 2014 #166
Those students (and hopefully some DUers) are supposedly smart enough to understand Blue_Tires Jun 2014 #146
You're right but its even worse than that. It would go back to a private donor organization, not to stevenleser Jun 2014 #156
Paying someone that kind of money for anything short of their left kidney is bullshit. Man or woman roguevalley Jun 2014 #78
I've love to see threads of outrage over the speaker fees BainsBane Jun 2014 #177
fuck them all. i don't care who you are. people are starving and they, all of them get fatter for roguevalley Jun 2014 #180
what does this have to do with her being a woman? snooper2 Jun 2014 #4
You tell me warrior1 Jun 2014 #6
Read the paper this weekend? There was an expose of *BILL* Clinton's speaking fees. Romulox Jun 2014 #148
I am wondering the same thing. Mojorabbit Jun 2014 #45
ok, briefly: males in the equivalent position to Hillary, (say, Cheney) make the same. No outrage librechik Jun 2014 #138
I don't think it has anything to do with being a woman - and Republican speakers are protested all djean111 Jun 2014 #5
It is a ridiculous fee. earthside Jun 2014 #11
She held a gun to their head and said "you must pay this ridiculous fee or I detonate the bomb" Omaha Steve Jun 2014 #37
'They'... Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #43
To be honest, it is not the students business yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #51
But I think we can all agree how awful it is to have foundations that do nothing truedelphi Jun 2014 #54
Foundations are for the Alumni and "selling the school" yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #58
I hate to break it to you Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #73
'The children'? Could you be any more condescending? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jun 2014 #72
Well your right yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #85
They can't? Seems like nobody told them they can't 'cause they are. WillowTree Jun 2014 #94
Message auto-removed Name removed Jun 2014 #152
No one is arguing they cant say it. The rest of your post is just as wrongheaded. stevenleser Jun 2014 #161
I agree Omaha Steve Jun 2014 #64
the foundation is paying it hfojvt Jun 2014 #56
There is no such thing as a ridiculous fee. Don't book people if you don't want to pay their fee. stevenleser Jun 2014 #68
The students who are protesting didn't book her. WillowTree Jun 2014 #96
The students don't run the University. They don't pay for most of its operation stevenleser Jun 2014 #121
Supply meet demand. Beacool Jun 2014 #79
It's only a ridiculous fee if the university doesn't pay it. Talk to the university about why they madinmaryland Jun 2014 #95
Many of these are young repukes that want attention BootinUp Jun 2014 #7
The meme is definitely right wing. joshcryer Jun 2014 #49
But leave it to DU to spread it around. Beacool Jun 2014 #80
This^ So many RW tools here they just cant feign being progressive. Anansi1171 Jun 2014 #128
What stupid speech (I mean, let's face it, they're ALL just another speech) is ChisolmTrailDem Jun 2014 #8
And I'd be glad to give you a buck or two to add to yours. truedelphi Jun 2014 #62
If Bill.... RobertEarl Jun 2014 #65
^^^^^^This is the correct answer. ^^^^^^^ woo me with science Jun 2014 #98
+1 leftstreet Jun 2014 #100
A speech that allows you to raise 3 million is worth a quarter of a million. In fact a speech that Bluenorthwest Jun 2014 #87
she inspires young people warrior1 Jun 2014 #9
No question Hillary inspires young people - to demand that their tuition money not be wasted on exorbitant speaking fees, yes, that's true. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #40
No question Hillary inspires young people - to demand that their tuition money not be wasted on exor yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #53
Before you think I mean grammar....I don't yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #55
I think its reasonable request by the students Ichingcarpenter Jun 2014 #10
They don't have wifi at that school? LuvNewcastle Jun 2014 #109
she's donating it to charity bigtree Jun 2014 #12
To her own charitable foundation LittleBlue Jun 2014 #15
you have a problem with what the Clinton foundation does? bigtree Jun 2014 #23
The New York Times exposed the foundation a year ago LittleBlue Jun 2014 #24
just a few of the 'wasteful, vanity projects' bigtree Jun 2014 #27
Clinton family at it again . . . typical of them bigtree Jun 2014 #38
I wonder if he made them carry his bags LittleBlue Jun 2014 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author bigtree Jun 2014 #46
That's a remarkable list. Don't expect it to change the Clinton hatred Arkansas Granny Jun 2014 #61
Of course not, they peddle RW talking points like pros. Beacool Jun 2014 #75
Your entire post is incredibly offensive and you should consider deleting it AngryAmish Jun 2014 #104
go bother someone else bigtree Jun 2014 #105
It was a bullshit expose. Beacool Jun 2014 #74
yep bigtree Jun 2014 #88
She could donate it to the students Ichingcarpenter Jun 2014 #18
I didn't know that. Beacool Jun 2014 #71
yep, Beacool bigtree Jun 2014 #76
Then what is the FREAKING problem????????? Beacool Jun 2014 #82
Robbing a public university of $225k LittleBlue Jun 2014 #13
Really she's robbing this university? warrior1 Jun 2014 #14
No, I'm not kidding LittleBlue Jun 2014 #17
Oh, for fuck's sake... Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #16
Thank you warrior1 Jun 2014 #20
The article says it best LittleBlue Jun 2014 #21
BLame the University not Ms. Clinton's warrior1 Jun 2014 #22
Oh, for fucks sake (Part II) Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #28
It's not like UNLV can just magic up an extra quarter million dollars Calista241 Jun 2014 #147
No. That's not reasonable at all... Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #172
Is it too much to ask to become informed before typing? Beacool Jun 2014 #77
They just wanted to get in on the pile on. Lex Jun 2014 #139
They take an article that has half of the fast as if it's written in stone, Beacool Jun 2014 #160
It is impossible to believe that some people are having such a hard time grasping where the money yeoman6987 Jun 2014 #86
Shameful - Simply Shameful cantbeserious Jun 2014 #19
And typical too. InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #41
So warrior1 Jun 2014 #25
I think it has more to do with the cost of tuition Savannahmann Jun 2014 #26
$6720 per year? Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #32
That shows how out touch betterdemsonly Jun 2014 #44
i have no friggin' clue what you're talking about Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #69
17% increase Savannahmann Jun 2014 #52
Oh, for fuck's sake (Part 3) Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #66
When someone says, "I still think X" after "X" has been tblue37 Jun 2014 #130
The rethugs are trying to deny her the only chance to escape grinding, generational poverty AngryAmish Jun 2014 #29
Did you miss the part about she's donating the money warrior1 Jun 2014 #30
What incredible generosity! AngryAmish Jun 2014 #33
2 questions. Would UNLY pay some other speaker $225K? Did Hillary give a speech there? NightWatcher Jun 2014 #31
Bill himself recently took in $500K for a speaking big Jeff In Milwaukee Jun 2014 #35
The problem is an issue bigger than than Hillary. Shoulders of Giants Jun 2014 #36
We have speakers tours that come here and I'd pay money to listen to some people NightWatcher Jun 2014 #39
Gotta start somewhere betterdemsonly Jun 2014 #47
This has nothing to with Hillary being a woman Boom Sound 416 Jun 2014 #48
In many parts of this country 225K will get you nice house. Throd Jun 2014 #57
These are the same Republicans who are suing Obama for trying to work. McCamy Taylor Jun 2014 #59
Exactly. Louisiana1976 Jun 2014 #84
She signed up with a speaker's agency elfin Jun 2014 #60
Eeks! Hillary's name next to $$$ signs in a headline. It's the attack of GOP spin! McCamy Taylor Jun 2014 #63
I think that they should take it up with the administrators of their university, not the speaker. Beacool Jun 2014 #70
The students don't understand that the foundation is paying Hillary's fee tammywammy Jun 2014 #81
tell that to the others who are calling it "shameful". Beacool Jun 2014 #83
The real shame is how tone deaf it all is. Throd Jun 2014 #89
Well, that's what the Republicans are saying (well, not about members of their own party who also Metric System Jun 2014 #90
It Is Shameful That A Supposed Aspirant For The Presidency Does Not Volunteer Her Experience For Free cantbeserious Jun 2014 #103
Dude, what part of the fee was privately funded and it's going to charity, did you miss? Beacool Jun 2014 #110
Dude - Where In The Story Arc Has A Charity Been Named - Sounds Like Wishful Thinking cantbeserious Jun 2014 #114
Read the comments from various people. Beacool Jun 2014 #117
Right - No Charity Named cantbeserious Jun 2014 #136
cantbeserious--FYI, the purpose of "eom" is as a courtesy to warn readers that tblue37 Jun 2014 #131
You Do It Your Way - I Do It My Way cantbeserious Jun 2014 #135
She has given PLENTY of speeches for free. And all of the money went to the Clinton Foundation, NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #140
If The Speeches Were Given For Free - How Could Any Money Go To A Foundation cantbeserious Jun 2014 #141
The speeches that were given for free at other organizations obviously didn't NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #145
So - With Respect To Money - Duplicity All Around cantbeserious Jun 2014 #149
No, not "duplicity all around". A lot of money raised for charity. NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #151
Still No Proof That The $ 225,000 Is Going To Charity - No Charity Named cantbeserious Jun 2014 #154
Oh bullshit MFrohike Jun 2014 #91
Seriously, it's not like anyone hangs on her every word quoting words of wisdom that will make a bit of difference in the lives of people (other than bankers). InAbLuEsTaTe Jun 2014 #116
+ 1,000 cantbeserious Jun 2014 #142
Kid Just Wants Publicity Rolo Jun 2014 #92
This message was self-deleted by its author Initech Jun 2014 #93
Did you bother to read the comments from other DUers? Beacool Jun 2014 #102
No, it doesn't. No, it doesn't. kiva Jun 2014 #118
No, it does not. Does not. Does not. The fee is paid by *private donations*, tblue37 Jun 2014 #133
Awww, the widdle R-W kiddies don't like the Free Market! WinkyDink Jun 2014 #97
It seems like they should be upset with their university if they were being honest. herding cats Jun 2014 #106
The fee was not from the University, it was from the UNLV Foundation, two totally Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #107
Also, the fee is being donated to charity. Beacool Jun 2014 #111
She an do as she pleases, she does have a generous heart. Thinkingabout Jun 2014 #112
Yes, it would, but I'm not holding my breath. Beacool Jun 2014 #113
I wonder how many of them are planning to donate all their own earnings to the tblue37 Jun 2014 #134
Let me guess...........none of them? Beacool Jun 2014 #162
And she's also done many speeches for free. NYC Liberal Jun 2014 #144
Yeah, it's one of many fake scandals. Beacool Jun 2014 #163
"The speaking fee...comes from donors’ private contributions for this event." VOX Jun 2014 #115
Riddle me this. bluedigger Jun 2014 #119
Because the people paying her fee betterdemsonly Jun 2014 #120
Then they should be protesting those people, not HRC. bluedigger Jun 2014 #122
Boo Hoo betterdemsonly Jun 2014 #123
Excellent rebuttal. bluedigger Jun 2014 #127
Your proof that they are "promoting austerity" for students? kiva Jun 2014 #143
The tuition is being raised 12% betterdemsonly Jun 2014 #171
Seriously, what part of 'this fee has nothing to do with student tuition' kiva Jun 2014 #173
Like this foundation has no influence over the regents decisions. betterdemsonly Jun 2014 #174
No they do not. kiva Jun 2014 #175
If you take the time to eyeball just who sits on the board of directors at truedelphi Jun 2014 #176
That may be true in California, kiva Jun 2014 #179
It's simple.The media does it to cause fake conflict. Beacool Jun 2014 #159
Hell Yeah! Katashi_itto Jun 2014 #125
Here's my 2 cent on this... Hippo_Tron Jun 2014 #132
All that hokey "we were dead broke!" and "I tried to care about money--but couldn't!" Romulox Jun 2014 #150
You actually believe that? Beacool Jun 2014 #157
Nope, and nobody else believed it, either. So why did she say it? Romulox Jun 2014 #158
No, she was just stating a fact, but leave it to the vultures to pounce on it. Beacool Jun 2014 #164
It's a losing argument. Nobody is sympathetic to the "Poor lil' Hillary" routine. Romulox Jun 2014 #165
See, that's where you assessment is wrong. Beacool Jun 2014 #167
If you think Hillary had a good week, well... Romulox Jun 2014 #168
I didn't say that she had a good week. Beacool Jun 2014 #169
Right. Just like 2008 primary voters forgot her pro-outsourcing speeches made while Romulox Jun 2014 #170
She should be taking that money from Fox News instead BainsBane Jun 2014 #178
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Clinton on the hot seat: ...»Reply #54