Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Smoking Gun: Wilson grand jury Witness #40-a liar & convicted felon was "Nowhere Near Canfield Dr" [View all]heaven05
(18,124 posts)41. 2 witnesses corroborated wilsonthepigs
Last edited Tue Dec 16, 2014, 05:41 PM - Edit history (1)
testimony on the charging scenario. 3 with this one in question, how is that,"quite a number. You also provide a link where witness 40 is expunged I have the GJ records also......most said he had hands up, not charging, three, that includes the racist, said he was charging.......
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Smoking Gun: Wilson grand jury Witness #40-a liar & convicted felon was "Nowhere Near Canfield Dr" [View all]
kpete
Dec 2014
OP
A lying bipolar who seeks public attention is all the FPD could come up with as a witness.
Dont call me Shirley
Dec 2014
#5
FYI: I started a thread about the infamous Witness #40 back on Dec 2. Not sure
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#6
No double jeopardy attaches to Grand Jury proceedings and there is no statute
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#20
The Grand Jury system was originally started in England and they abolished it in 1930 because it
jwirr
Dec 2014
#21
The police are no longer a police force - they are a military force let loose on the American public
jwirr
Dec 2014
#22
even a military force is not supposed to randomly murder - this is far worse, it is like a criminal
hollysmom
Dec 2014
#29
The real issue and bottom line is that the prosecutor should never have taken thise wittnesses
sammy750
Dec 2014
#30
That pretty much requires that that GJ decision must be overturned and a new Federal
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#31
She was presented as someone who witnessed the crime. That + her obvious racism should have
bettyellen
Dec 2014
#61