Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

synergie

(1,901 posts)
135. Sorry, but your misinformed views of the party you malign don't fit the word you misuse.
Thu Sep 1, 2016, 02:00 AM
Sep 2016

You seem to think your false beliefs are backed up by facts, they are not. You don't seem to understand the word or the party you apply it to. I'm sorry, but developed coherent level of correspondence requires that one is capable of understanding and engaging at that level, and from your rant here, that does not seem to be the case.

I'm sorry that you are so very deluded about our party and that you believe any and all untruths fed to you, but the shame is yours, the shallowness is yours, long posts don't substitute for facts, truth or an actual understanding of the words you claim to understand but fail to demonstrate that you grasp.

IMO, you don't seem to understand what you're exposing here about your bias, your failure to understand and the difference between reality and the things you fervently believe because the talking points have been repeated so often.

You have not done anything close, sorry but that is also the truth. The wiki page does not nail your frequent misuse of the term, your constant and consistent use of in the pejorative to attack a party that you don't seem to respect very much or are terribly informed about. Screeching "corporatist" is not the high level argument you seem to wish to believe it is.

Sorry, but embracing truth requires to you embrace that what you're saying isn't "truth" nor have you been honest or truthful about your use of a term you don't quite get.

Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #1
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #5
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #41
Any day that H.A Goodman loses is a good one! Dawson Leery Aug 2016 #2
Good for DWS, this was predicted. Thinkingabout Aug 2016 #3
So glad God and Karma hooked up and got it done underthematrix Aug 2016 #4
K&R ismnotwasm Aug 2016 #6
56-43. Maybe now she got the message that throwing pot smokers in prison Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #7
No, she didn't nikto Aug 2016 #21
How many pot smokers did she throw in prison? George II Aug 2016 #71
Let's start with Brigit Kirouac, shall we? Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #116
Just ask Elizabeth Warren--save some scorn for her, too, why don't you...? MADem Aug 2016 #122
That's quite a stretch. That's like someone moving from a state where someone can legally... George II Aug 2016 #123
Fine, and the people of Florida are gonna send her to prison for 10 years. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #127
K&R sheshe2 Aug 2016 #8
What this is supposed to be a good thing gabeana Aug 2016 #9
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #10
She recognized Jeff Weaver is an incompetent asshole who lost Bernie the nomination emulatorloo Aug 2016 #13
No thats was not the reason gabeana Aug 2016 #15
Yep, Bernie primary supporter here and HRC did a great job! emulatorloo Aug 2016 #17
It's AWESOME!!!!!!! MohRokTah Aug 2016 #11
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #16
This is the era of the Neoliberal Democrat nikto Aug 2016 #22
I know and here on DU gabeana Aug 2016 #23
It is pitiful and tragic to watch nikto Aug 2016 #26
This message was self-deleted by its author jack_krass Aug 2016 #83
They like her mostly because she helped defeat Bernie jack_krass Aug 2016 #85
No, we got a bunch of people who apparently seem to enjoy pretending that Democrats are Republicans synergie Aug 2016 #109
What a sorry remark. Republicans oppose choice, LGBTQ rights, and want prayer in schools, for MADem Aug 2016 #53
Primary is over now. Time to get behind the nominee. MohRokTah Aug 2016 #29
True, now that she is nominee gabeana Aug 2016 #31
You don't live in Florida do you? nt Mojorabbit Aug 2016 #42
I donate money and make remote calls for Demcratic Candidates from all over the country. eom MohRokTah Aug 2016 #45
That is what I thought. nt Mojorabbit Aug 2016 #48
I donated quite a bit to both DWS and Murphy. eom MohRokTah Aug 2016 #49
she's strongly against legalizing weed, which apparently no Democrat supports. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #12
That was Eliz. Warren's position until very, very recently. MADem Aug 2016 #54
If California passes measure 64, it won't matter. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #56
Last I heard, 64 is dominating in the yes column zappaman Aug 2016 #77
You guys need to not fuck it up this time. For real. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #117
Me too. zappaman Aug 2016 #126
We had the same situation up here, pretty much. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #128
MA has medical MJ now, and in Sep we'll be voting on a ballot initiative. MADem Aug 2016 #130
If DWS wants to be a less divisive figure going forward, great. Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #133
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #14
Good for her, murielm99 Aug 2016 #18
Democrats applauding a virtual Reaganite supply-sider?? nikto Aug 2016 #19
Her constituents voted for her. Sad for you and me maybe, but we aren't voters in her district emulatorloo Aug 2016 #20
Neoliberal is an actual word with meaning that applies clearly to some politicians nikto Aug 2016 #25
I know it is an "actual word". Half of DU doesn't know what the fuck it means emulatorloo Aug 2016 #28
I agree the word shouldn't be used as a perjorative just to hurt feelings nikto Aug 2016 #36
Words are great. Eko Aug 2016 #43
Hearing your rant convinces me ... nikto Aug 2016 #132
Yeah, not really. Those who are actually ranting and spreading silly talking points to synergie Sep 2016 #138
My rant? Eko Sep 2016 #139
+100 emulatorloo Hekate Sep 2016 #136
The more left Democrats never seem to show up for our nominees. MohRokTah Aug 2016 #30
Neoliberal is a factual term nikto Aug 2016 #38
I have yet to see you use the term correctly. MohRokTah Aug 2016 #39
In the immortal words of a former acquaintance 1939 Aug 2016 #57
+1. Very silly, but take away that word and Hortensis Aug 2016 #78
Well then, stop being such a cipher and explain it to me nikto Aug 2016 #131
I found a link for you, so that you can learn what the word means synergie Aug 2016 #110
Post removed Post removed Sep 2016 #134
Sorry, but your misinformed views of the party you malign don't fit the word you misuse. synergie Sep 2016 #135
+1 synergie. One small critique.... Hekate Sep 2016 #137
The same New Deal that excluded minorities from its benefits for decades? BobbyDrake Aug 2016 #60
Did you forget about the millions of Rex Aug 2016 #87
Excellent news.. John Lewis, President Obama and Hillary endorsed her! Cha Aug 2016 #24
Welcome back! In_The_Wind Aug 2016 #59
Yes. I put a lot of weight on that. Hortensis Aug 2016 #79
REC riversedge Aug 2016 #27
I just threw up in my mouth a little..... fantase56 Aug 2016 #32
Lots of ToS violations in this thread above and below Bernardo de La Paz Aug 2016 #40
Let us Floridians grieve for one night FFS. nt Mojorabbit Aug 2016 #44
Most of them (not the Republicans, of course) are celebrating. MADem Aug 2016 #55
This Floridian is celebrating mcar Aug 2016 #99
And lots of "post removed" also, thankfully. George II Aug 2016 #72
I've never seen such a spectacle. It's like they just don't care any more... NurseJackie Aug 2016 #100
Bingo!!! We have a winner in the "It's like they just don't care any more..." Many more don't than Purveyor Aug 2016 #102
I thought the people who hated the Dems decamped! MADem Aug 2016 #114
Me Too... Raine Aug 2016 #65
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #33
I guess that's what Democrats look like in some places. immoderate Aug 2016 #34
I suppose you'd just LET granny eat that pot brownie without going to prison, huh Warren DeMontague Aug 2016 #46
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #35
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #37
I'm happy for her, Jamaal510 Aug 2016 #47
Exactly, and me too! KMOD Aug 2016 #50
Going further, congrats to democracy itself and to Hortensis Aug 2016 #80
Good for her! There's one seat we'll keep and I'm optimistic about Murphy beating Maru Kitteh Aug 2016 #51
Why are you happy that right-wingers won those primaries? Ken Burch Aug 2016 #52
Why are you calling good Democrats names? MohRokTah Aug 2016 #64
what's with G_j Aug 2016 #66
The TOS is what governs this site. Members are expected to abide by the TOS, on this site... George II Aug 2016 #124
no kidding .. G_j Aug 2016 #125
I'm not calling them names. Ken Burch Aug 2016 #89
I'm wondering G_j Aug 2016 #92
...or a singularity of thought.... alittlelark Aug 2016 #129
‘I Will Be Blunt. I Want Alan Grayson To Lose.’ KMOD Aug 2016 #97
That Hedge Fund Wife Abuser talked a real good game--but was responsible for absolutely ZERO MADem Aug 2016 #118
spot on!! KMOD Aug 2016 #121
This is not meant to be mean or starky... Funtatlaguy Aug 2016 #58
President Obama thinks so. KMOD Aug 2016 #103
Yeah Gothmog Aug 2016 #61
They're cheering about this over on Fox News this morning, too. n/t Hugin Aug 2016 #62
I still think that Wasserman-Schultz is a stain on our party, because Stellar Aug 2016 #63
Yes, she was used as a wedge by a group new to the party who were intent on causing synergie Aug 2016 #86
No...actually that just one of the issues I have with her Stellar Aug 2016 #88
Regardless of your personal issues with her, you cannot pretend that she was not used to attempt synergie Aug 2016 #90
Yep, she is a Huuuge issue! Stellar Aug 2016 #93
You seem to be hung up on the lies told about her during the primaries, and yes synergie Aug 2016 #95
O.K. whatever nt Stellar Aug 2016 #96
I have a terrific link for you KMOD Aug 2016 #101
I watched the convention...and rolled my eyes when he said that, I think most of us did. nt Stellar Aug 2016 #104
who is "most of us"? KMOD Aug 2016 #105
As I edited my last post and put 'Sanders' supporter. I'm done with her! Stellar Aug 2016 #108
Stellar, this is like blaming the log for being divisive Hortensis Aug 2016 #115
Please forgive me, I can't talk about her anymore... Stellar Aug 2016 #119
Voting blue's where we meet and really 99.5% Hortensis Aug 2016 #120
So the one that makes her money on the backs of others Raine Aug 2016 #67
And Democrats cheer for the victory Bettie Aug 2016 #70
And there was much rejoicing... bullwinkle428 Aug 2016 #68
Lots of "post removed" posts in this thread. Can someone tell me why betsuni Aug 2016 #69
DWS used the DNC to help her campaign against Canova. She also refused to endorse Democratic candid think Aug 2016 #73
Based on dozens of the responses in this thread, apparently.... George II Aug 2016 #74
silly G_j Aug 2016 #75
+1000, George II. Hortensis Aug 2016 #81
Fantastic! This pleases me very much! NurseJackie Aug 2016 #76
Post removed Post removed Aug 2016 #82
DWS is a lifeong Democrat who has done good work for the party. MohRokTah Aug 2016 #84
I think we learned who many of the "DINOs" were shortly after Clinton sewed up the nomination. George II Aug 2016 #94
Pity. At least she's no longer DNC chair... n/t backscatter712 Aug 2016 #91
Thank G*d for that - at least she can now concentrate on. . . DinahMoeHum Aug 2016 #106
Ha! Wow ..Hardly a complete fing failure. She has brought Hillary to a Solid Lead in Fl. misterhighwasted Aug 2016 #111
Excuse me, but her "leadership" at DNC cost the Dems in 2014. DinahMoeHum Aug 2016 #112
Whatever! 2014 was Lost because of lazy voters. misterhighwasted Aug 2016 #113
K&R mcar Aug 2016 #98
K&R! stonecutter357 Aug 2016 #107
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Debbie Wasserman Schultz ...»Reply #135